LexinFintech vs Nu
LX and NU side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LX and NU compare
Nu grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.0% versus −7.4% for LexinFintech).
Nu scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for LexinFintech), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LX | NU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.608 | $11.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −83.5% | −27.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.52 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 4,667 | 1.6M |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.4% | 37.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.5% | 84.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 45.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 45.7% (better) | 44.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.8% (better) | −94.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.0% | 42.0% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 18.2% |
| FCF margin | 24.8% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 30.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.39 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.51 | −1.24 |
| Current ratio | 1.89 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.9% | 59.8% |
| Held by insiders | 16.1% | 19.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$10.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 6 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- LX stock overview
- LX income statement
- LX valuation and score
- NU stock overview
- NU income statement
- NU valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.