Lattice Semiconductor vs Universal Display
LSCC and OLED side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LSCC and OLED compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Universal Display ($17.4B against $4.1B).
On earnings, Universal Display is cheaper: it trades at 18.4× trailing earnings, against 472× for Lattice Semiconductor.
Lattice Semiconductor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.3% versus −1.9% for Universal Display).
Universal Display keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 36.7% compared with 5.6% at Lattice Semiconductor.
Universal Display pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Lattice Semiconductor does not pay one.
Universal Display scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 12 for Lattice Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LSCC | OLED |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.4B | $4.1B |
| Share price | $122.77 | $90.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.1% | −24.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 46.2% | −41.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 1,174 | 469 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 472× | 18.4× (better) |
| P/S | 26.8× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/B | 22.1× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 360× | 16.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 87.6× | 17.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 3.74 |
| FCF yield | 1.1% | 5.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $11.01 | $146.04 |
| Margin of safety | −1015% | 38.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.3% (better) | −1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 4.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.0% (better) | 6.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −43.3% | 12.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.0% | 74.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | 34.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.6% | 36.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 30.6% | 36.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.9% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.5% | 15.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 3.02 | 7.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 57.01 (better) | 13.59 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 39.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 24.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.20% | 5.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.20% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 97.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.0M | $1.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 10.9% |
Go deeper
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
- OLED stock overview
- OLED income statement
- OLED valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.