Logitech International vs Palo Alto Networks
LOGI and PANW side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LOGI and PANW compare
Palo Alto Networks is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as Logitech International ($299B against $13.7B).
Palo Alto Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.5% versus 6.6% for Logitech International).
Logitech International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.3% compared with 2.7% at Palo Alto Networks.
Logitech International pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Palo Alto Networks does not pay one.
Logitech International scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 8 for Palo Alto Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LOGI | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.7B | $299B |
| Share price | $95.53 | $365.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −17.5% | 68.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.4% | 345% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 7,300 | 8,014 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.5× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× (better) | 26.1× |
| P/B | 5.8× (better) | 10.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7× (better) | 191× |
| P/FCF | 13.5× (better) | 72.8× |
| PEG | 0.60 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.4% (better) | 1.4% |
| Fair value | $119.66 | $54.12 |
| Margin of safety | 20.2% (better) | −576% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.6% | 24.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.6% | 22.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | −72.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.1% | 70.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.7% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net margin | 16.3% (better) | 2.7% |
| FCF margin | 20.7% | 35.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 35.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 116% (better) | 2.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.31 (better) | 0.87 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.59 | 8.90 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% (better) | 0.33% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.6% (better) | 0.33% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 81.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.24% | 0.66% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.6M (better) | −$123M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- LOGI stock overview
- LOGI income statement
- LOGI valuation and score
- PANW stock overview
- PANW income statement
- PANW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.