Fortinet vs Logitech International
FTNT and LOGI side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FTNT and LOGI compare
Fortinet is the larger company, worth 7.3 times as much as Logitech International ($99.8B against $13.7B).
On earnings, Logitech International is cheaper: it trades at 17.5× trailing earnings, against 47.9× for Fortinet.
Fortinet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.8% versus 6.6% for Logitech International).
Fortinet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.2% compared with 16.3% at Logitech International.
Logitech International pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Fortinet does not pay one.
Logitech International scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 16 for Fortinet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FTNT | LOGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $99.8B | $13.7B |
| Share price | $136.08 | $95.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.6% | −17.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.4% | 20.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 15K | 7,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.9× | 17.5× (better) |
| P/S | 13.3× | 2.8× (better) |
| P/B | 64.4× | 5.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.4× | 13.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 32.0× | 13.5× (better) |
| PEG | 1.51 | 0.60 (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.1% | 7.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $109.03 | $119.66 |
| Margin of safety | −24.8% | 20.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.8% (better) | 6.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.3% (better) | −1.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.3% | 26.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 13.1% | 29.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.1% (better) | −2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 80.2% (better) | 45.1% |
| Operating margin | 32.4% (better) | 17.7% |
| Net margin | 28.2% (better) | 16.3% |
| FCF margin | 41.4% (better) | 20.7% |
| Return on equity | 117% (better) | 35.3% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 116% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.94 | – |
| Interest coverage | 136× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.28 | 2.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.98 | 8.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.7% |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | 3.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 5.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 68.6% | – |
| Held by insiders | 10.8% | 0.24% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$136M | −$1.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- FTNT stock overview
- FTNT income statement
- FTNT valuation and score
- LOGI stock overview
- LOGI income statement
- LOGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.