loanDepot vs LendingTree
LDI and TREE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LDI and TREE compare
LendingTree is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as loanDepot ($517M against $160M).
LendingTree grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.1% versus 9.2% for loanDepot).
LendingTree keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with −6.8% at loanDepot.
LendingTree scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for loanDepot), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LDI | TREE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $160M | $517M |
| Share price | $0.472 | $36.84 |
| Change, 1 year | −83.3% | −31.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.9% | −71.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.58 | 2.06 |
| Employees | 4,700 | 926 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 5.6× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.4× |
| P/B | – | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 35.7× |
| P/FCF | 0.6× (better) | 6.4× |
| FCF yield | 167% (better) | 15.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.2% | 23.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −22.7% | 4.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 600% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 545% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 29.1% |
| Operating margin | – | 0.37% |
| Net margin | −6.8% | 7.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 21.4% (better) | 6.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 51.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 0.80% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.31 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 11.58 |
| Current ratio | – | 1.57 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.06 | 1.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.9% | 81.4% |
| Held by insiders | 38.3% | 25.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.6% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- LDI stock overview
- LDI income statement
- LDI valuation and score
- TREE stock overview
- TREE income statement
- TREE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.