nLIGHT vs Lattice Semiconductor
LASR and LSCC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LASR and LSCC compare
Lattice Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 6.7 times as much as nLIGHT ($16.0B against $2.4B).
nLIGHT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.6% versus 33.3% for Lattice Semiconductor).
Lattice Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −4.0% at nLIGHT.
Lattice Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for nLIGHT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LASR | LSCC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $16.0B |
| Share price | $41.25 | $112.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 24.0% | 71.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 52.7% | 33.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.76 | 1.82 |
| Employees | 800 | 1,174 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 432× |
| P/S | 7.5× (better) | 24.5× |
| P/B | 5.4× (better) | 20.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 329× |
| P/FCF | 109× | 80.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | 1.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $20.57 | $11.00 |
| Margin of safety | −101% (better) | −922% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 39.6% (better) | 33.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.2% | 5.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 14.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 13.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −43.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.0% | 69.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −6.0% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.0% | 5.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.9% | 30.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.9% | 4.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −12.9% | 6.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −22.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 7.71 (better) | 3.02 |
| Altman Z-score | 16.90 | 52.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.22% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.22% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.2% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 12.5% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$80.9M | −$19.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- LASR stock overview
- LASR income statement
- LASR valuation and score
- LSCC stock overview
- LSCC income statement
- LSCC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.