Kinder Morgan vs National Grid
KMI and NGG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KMI and NGG compare
Kinder Morgan grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.5% versus −3.8% for National Grid).
Kinder Morgan keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.3% compared with 18.3% at National Grid.
Kinder Morgan pays a dividend yielding 3.5%; National Grid does not pay one.
Kinder Morgan scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for National Grid), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KMI | NGG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $75.4B | – |
| Share price | $33.87 | $83.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 30.8% | 11.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.8% | 30.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.47 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 11K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.7× | – |
| P/S | 4.2× | – |
| P/B | 2.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.9× | – |
| PEG | 3.13 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | – |
| Fair value | $29.54 | – |
| Margin of safety | −14.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.5% (better) | −3.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.3% (better) | 11.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | 6.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 93.9% (better) | 7.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 29.0% | 30.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.3% (better) | 18.3% |
| FCF margin | 17.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | 8.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% (better) | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.02 (better) | 1.19 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.18 (better) | 8.54 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | 0.76 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 75.8% | 50.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 8 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.7% | 1.2% |
| Held by insiders | 12.1% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.8M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | – |
Go deeper
- KMI stock overview
- KMI income statement
- KMI valuation and score
- NGG stock overview
- NGG income statement
- NGG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.