Johnson Controls International vs Trane Technologies
JCI and TT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JCI and TT compare
Johnson Controls International and Trane Technologies are about the same size, with market caps of $90.3B and $90.2B.
On earnings, Johnson Controls International is cheaper: it trades at 25.9× trailing earnings, against 29.0× for Trane Technologies.
Trane Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus 6.8% for Johnson Controls International).
Johnson Controls International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with 13.6% at Trane Technologies.
Both pay dividends: Johnson Controls International yields 0.81% and Trane Technologies 0.77%.
Trane Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 14 for Johnson Controls International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JCI | TT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $90.3B | $90.2B |
| Share price | $149.03 | $410.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.5% | −4.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 99.7% | 122% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 87K | 45K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 23 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.9× (better) | 29.0× |
| P/S | 3.6× (better) | 3.9× |
| P/B | 6.7× (better) | 9.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.4× | 20.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 28.5× | 23.6× (better) |
| PEG | 0.81 (better) | 1.44 |
| FCF yield | 3.5% | 4.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $128.63 | $491.31 |
| Margin of safety | −15.9% | 16.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% | 10.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 11.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 60.4% (better) | 7.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 70.6% (better) | 8.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 43.0% (better) | 29.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.7% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 17.9% |
| Net margin | 14.3% (better) | 13.6% |
| FCF margin | 12.7% | 16.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 24.4% | 36.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.70 | 0.46 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.53 | 0.92 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 19.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.00 | 1.12 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.79 | 5.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.81% (better) | 0.77% |
| Payout ratio | 27.3% | 28.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 12.1% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 6.5% (better) | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.3% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.9% | 87.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.31% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.2M (better) | −$52.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- JCI stock overview
- JCI income statement
- JCI valuation and score
- TT stock overview
- TT income statement
- TT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.