StockData

Johnson Controls International vs Lennox International

JCI and LII side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How JCI and LII compare

Johnson Controls International is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as Lennox International ($90.3B against $11.9B).

On earnings, Lennox International is cheaper: it trades at 15.3× trailing earnings, against 25.9× for Johnson Controls International.

Johnson Controls International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus −2.1% for Lennox International).

Lennox International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.9% compared with 14.3% at Johnson Controls International.

Both pay dividends: Johnson Controls International yields 0.81% and Lennox International 1.5%.

Lennox International scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 14 for Johnson Controls International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricJCILII
Size and price
Market cap$90.3B$11.9B
Share price$149.03$344.08
Change, 1 year31.5%−29.5%
Change, 5 years99.7%13.9%
Beta (5Y)1.021.10
Employees87K13K
StockData Score
Total score1420 (better)
Valuation score25 (better)
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score45 (better)
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score34 (better)
Valuation
P/E25.9×15.3× (better)
P/S3.6×2.2× (better)
P/B6.7× (better)9.2×
EV/EBITDA28.4×11.5× (better)
P/FCF28.5×16.1× (better)
PEG0.81 (better)0.85
FCF yield3.5%6.2% (better)
Fair value$128.63$483.03
Margin of safety−15.9%28.8% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.8% (better)−2.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.1%7.4% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)60.4% (better)−6.6%
EPS growth (TTM)70.6% (better)−4.8%
EPS growth, 5Y average43.0% (better)19.8%
Profitability
Gross margin36.7% (better)33.3%
Operating margin–19.7%
Net margin14.3%14.9% (better)
FCF margin12.7%13.9% (better)
Return on equity24.4%68.1% (better)
Return on invested capital–33.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.70 (better)1.22
Net debt / EBITDA2.531.31 (better)
Interest coverage–18.5×
Current ratio1.001.57 (better)
Altman Z-score2.795.93 (better)
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.81%1.5% (better)
Payout ratio27.3%23.1%
Years of dividend growth516 (better)
Dividend growth, 5Y average7.7%10.4% (better)
Buyback yield6.5% (better)2.8%
Shareholder yield7.3% (better)4.4%
Ownership
Held by institutions89.9%77.6%
Held by insiders0.31%10.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$25.2M−$1.4M (better)
Superinvestors holding4 (better)1
Short interest, % of float1.5%8.7%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.