Jbt Marel vs Middleby
JBTM and MIDD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JBTM and MIDD compare
Jbt Marel and Middleby are about the same size, with market caps of $6.6B and $6.3B.
Jbt Marel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.9% versus 8.4% for Middleby).
Jbt Marel keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.9% compared with −13.9% at Middleby.
Jbt Marel pays a dividend yielding 0.32%; Middleby does not pay one.
Jbt Marel scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Middleby), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JBTM | MIDD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.6B | $6.3B |
| Share price | $126.56 | $138.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −11.0% | 12.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −27.1% | −26.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 12K | 2,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.4× | – |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.2× | 12.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.2× | 13.0× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.7% | 7.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $119.74 | $149.50 |
| Margin of safety | −5.7% | 7.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.9% (better) | 8.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.1% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −211% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −217% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.6% | 38.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.3% | 16.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.9% (better) | −13.9% |
| FCF margin | 7.9% | 14.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.3% (better) | −16.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.8% | 8.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.90 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.46 | 2.74 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.04 | 3.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | – |
| Payout ratio | 10.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 15.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.32% | 15.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 9.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.3M | $15.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.0% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- JBTM stock overview
- JBTM income statement
- JBTM valuation and score
- MIDD stock overview
- MIDD income statement
- MIDD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.