Jbt Marel vs Pentair
JBTM and PNR side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How JBTM and PNR compare
Pentair is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Jbt Marel ($10.6B against $5.7B).
On earnings, Pentair is cheaper: it trades at 16.6× trailing earnings, against 29.7× for Jbt Marel.
Jbt Marel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.9% versus −2.1% for Pentair).
Pentair keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.2% compared with 4.9% at Jbt Marel.
Both pay dividends: Jbt Marel yields 0.37% and Pentair 1.2%.
Pentair scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 13 for Jbt Marel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | JBTM | PNR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.7B | $10.6B |
| Share price | $109.17 | $66.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.9% | −38.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.0% | −10.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 12K | 9,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.7× | 16.6× (better) |
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 25.1× | 14.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 18.3× | 15.7× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.52 |
| FCF yield | 5.5% | 6.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $115.53 | $85.88 |
| Margin of safety | 5.5% | 22.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 44.9% (better) | −2.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.1% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 6.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 8.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.6% | 41.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.3% | 20.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.9% | 16.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.9% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.46 | 1.86 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.88 | 3.85 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | 1.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 10.9% | 26.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 5.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.37% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 95.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.4% | 0.81% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.2M | −$2.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- JBTM stock overview
- JBTM income statement
- JBTM valuation and score
- PNR stock overview
- PNR income statement
- PNR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.