StockData

Hunt J B Transport Services vs Old Dominion Freight Line

JBHT and ODFL side by side, both in trucking and courier services, except air. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How JBHT and ODFL compare

Old Dominion Freight Line is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Hunt J B Transport Services ($35.8B against $20.8B).

On earnings, Hunt J B Transport Services is cheaper: it trades at 31.3× trailing earnings, against 33.2× for Old Dominion Freight Line.

Hunt J B Transport Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus −0.64% for Old Dominion Freight Line).

Old Dominion Freight Line keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.4% compared with 5.3% at Hunt J B Transport Services.

Both pay dividends: Hunt J B Transport Services yields 0.81% and Old Dominion Freight Line 0.67%.

Hunt J B Transport Services scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Old Dominion Freight Line), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricJBHTODFL
Size and price
Market cap$20.8B$35.8B
Share price$221.08$172.56
Change, 1 year30.9%26.8%
Change, 5 years14.4%−1.1%
Beta (5Y)0.891.10
Employees8,70421K
StockData Score
Total score18 (better)17
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score55
Health score6 (better)5
Dividend score44
Valuation
P/E31.3× (better)33.2×
P/S1.6× (better)6.4×
P/B5.7× (better)7.9×
EV/EBITDA13.1× (better)19.6×
P/FCF18.9× (better)32.1×
FCF yield5.3% (better)3.1%
Fair value$191.19$143.75
Margin of safety−15.6% (better)−20.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.3% (better)−0.64%
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.5%6.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)21.8% (better)−0.52%
EPS growth (TTM)28.4% (better)1.4%
EPS growth, 5Y average5.2%11.3% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin7.5%25.8% (better)
Net margin5.3%19.4% (better)
FCF margin8.7%19.9% (better)
Return on equity18.4%24.8% (better)
Return on invested capital14.3%25.1% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.310.00 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA0.68 (better)−0.15
Interest coverage13.7×–
Current ratio1.261.89 (better)
Altman Z-score4.9621.02 (better)
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.81% (better)0.67%
Payout ratio25.1%21.8%
Years of dividend growth12 (better)9
Dividend growth, 5Y average10.3%30.1% (better)
Buyback yield2.6% (better)1.5%
Shareholder yield3.5% (better)2.2%
Ownership
Held by institutions77.2%79.8%
Held by insiders21.8%8.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$12.7M (better)−$26.2M
Superinvestors holding–2
Short interest, % of float4.4%4.7%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.