StockData

Hunt J B Transport Services vs Knight-Swift Transportation

JBHT and KNX side by side, both in trucking and courier services, except air. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How JBHT and KNX compare

Hunt J B Transport Services is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Knight-Swift Transportation ($20.8B against $9.9B).

On earnings, Hunt J B Transport Services is cheaper: it trades at 31.3× trailing earnings, against 234× for Knight-Swift Transportation.

Hunt J B Transport Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus 4.1% for Knight-Swift Transportation).

Hunt J B Transport Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.3% compared with 0.56% at Knight-Swift Transportation.

Both pay dividends: Hunt J B Transport Services yields 0.81% and Knight-Swift Transportation 1.3%.

Hunt J B Transport Services scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for Knight-Swift Transportation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricJBHTKNX
Size and price
Market cap$20.8B$9.9B
Share price$221.08$60.77
Change, 1 year30.9%36.6%
Change, 5 years14.4%5.4%
Beta (5Y)0.890.90
Employees8,704200
StockData Score
Total score18 (better)6
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score5 (better)0
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score4 (better)2
Valuation
P/E31.3× (better)234×
P/S1.6×1.3× (better)
P/B5.7×1.4× (better)
EV/EBITDA13.1×9.9× (better)
P/FCF18.9×–
FCF yield5.3%–
Fair value$191.19$64.58
Margin of safety−15.6%5.9% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.3% (better)4.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average4.5%9.8% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)21.8% (better)−74.0%
EPS growth (TTM)28.4% (better)−74.5%
EPS growth, 5Y average5.2% (better)−29.8%
Profitability
Operating margin7.5% (better)2.7%
Net margin5.3% (better)0.56%
FCF margin8.7%–
Return on equity18.4% (better)0.61%
Return on invested capital14.3% (better)1.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.310.02 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA0.68 (better)−0.02
Interest coverage13.7× (better)1.6×
Current ratio1.26 (better)0.88
Altman Z-score4.96 (better)2.17
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.81%1.3% (better)
Payout ratio25.1%289%
Years of dividend growth12 (better)6
Dividend growth, 5Y average10.3%17.6% (better)
Buyback yield2.6%–
Shareholder yield3.5% (better)1.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions77.2%100%
Held by insiders21.8%2.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$12.7M (better)−$25.7M
Short interest, % of float4.4%8.4%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.