Intel vs Micron Technology
INTC and MU side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How INTC and MU compare
Micron Technology is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Intel ($999B against $332B).
Micron Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (256% versus 7.5% for Intel).
Micron Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 63.8% compared with −19.8% at Intel.
Micron Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.06%; Intel does not pay one.
Micron Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (25 against 4 for Intel), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | INTC | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $332B | $999B |
| Share price | $65.76 | $884.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 59.1% | 290% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.1% | 1113% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 1.88 |
| Employees | 109K | 61K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 25 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.9× |
| P/S | 5.8× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/B | 3.8× (better) | 7.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.8× |
| P/FCF | 117× | 16.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.85% | 5.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $42.48 | $1920.62 |
| Margin of safety | −54.8% | 53.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.5% | 256% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −7.5% | 36.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 895% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 879% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 70.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.6% | 80.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.14% | 74.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −19.8% | 63.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.0% | 44.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −12.2% | 88.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.05% | 107% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.58 | 0.04 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.35 |
| Interest coverage | −0.1× | 937× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.60 | 3.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.65 | 14.11 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.06% |
| Payout ratio | – | 0.72% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 39.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.07% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.13% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.9% | 77.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $2.8M (better) | −$302M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- INTC stock overview
- INTC income statement
- INTC valuation and score
- MU stock overview
- MU income statement
- MU valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.