Immersion vs Logitech International
IMMR and LOGI side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IMMR and LOGI compare
Logitech International is the larger company, worth 57 times as much as Immersion ($13.7B against $239M).
On earnings, Logitech International is cheaper: it trades at 17.5× trailing earnings, against 21.8× for Immersion.
Logitech International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.3% compared with 0.60% at Immersion.
Both pay dividends: Immersion yields 4.2% and Logitech International 1.8%.
Logitech International scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 11 for Immersion), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IMMR | LOGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $239M | $13.7B |
| Share price | $7.20 | $95.53 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.9% | −17.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.84% | 20.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 20 | 7,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.8× | 17.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 5.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.9× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/FCF | 3.9× (better) | 13.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.60 |
| FCF yield | 25.6% (better) | 7.4% |
| Fair value | $27.54 | $119.66 |
| Margin of safety | 73.9% (better) | 20.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 6.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 117% (better) | −1.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 26.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 29.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −2.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 45.1% |
| Operating margin | 1.9% | 17.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.60% | 16.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.5% | 20.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.5% | 35.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 14.8% | 116% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.14 | 2.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.28 | 8.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | 102% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% | 5.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 58.0% | – |
| Held by insiders | 18.6% | 0.24% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.0K (better) | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.8% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- IMMR stock overview
- IMMR income statement
- IMMR valuation and score
- LOGI stock overview
- LOGI income statement
- LOGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.