Idacorp vs Portland General Electric
IDA and POR side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IDA and POR compare
Idacorp is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Portland General Electric ($8.4B against $5.2B).
Portland General Electric grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.3% versus −1.2% for Idacorp).
Both pay dividends: Idacorp yields 2.4% and Portland General Electric 4.8%.
Idacorp scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Portland General Electric), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IDA | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.4B | $5.2B |
| Share price | $145.38 | $44.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | −2.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 38.3% | −11.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 2,174 | 2,877 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.6× | – |
| P/S | 4.8× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 2.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.7× | 9.3× (better) |
| PEG | 5.02 | – |
| FCF yield | −6.9% | −3.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $102.70 | $51.31 |
| Margin of safety | −41.6% | 13.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.2% | 1.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.3% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.7% | 10.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.3% (better) | 14.1% |
| Net margin | 18.5% | – |
| FCF margin | −33.1% | −5.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 4.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.95 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.00 | 4.52 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.1× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 (better) | 0.98 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.27 (better) | 0.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 4.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 58.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 10 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 5.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −1.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 4.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.42% | 0.54% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$963K (better) | −$1.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.0% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- IDA stock overview
- IDA income statement
- IDA valuation and score
- POR stock overview
- POR income statement
- POR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.