Howmet Aerospace vs Quanex Building Products
HWM and NX side by side, both in rolling, drawing, and extruding of nonferrous. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HWM and NX compare
Howmet Aerospace is the larger company, worth 84 times as much as Quanex Building Products ($79.4B against $947M).
On earnings, Quanex Building Products is cheaper: it trades at 20.9× trailing earnings, against 39.0× for Howmet Aerospace.
Howmet Aerospace grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.0% versus 1.3% for Quanex Building Products).
Howmet Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.1% compared with 2.4% at Quanex Building Products.
Both pay dividends: Howmet Aerospace yields 0.25% and Quanex Building Products 1.5%.
Howmet Aerospace scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for Quanex Building Products), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HWM | NX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $79.4B | $947M |
| Share price | $199.22 | $20.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.1% | 42.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 496% | −8.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 730 | 7,071 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.0× | 20.9× (better) |
| P/S | 8.2× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 13.8× | 1.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.3× | 7.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 41.2× | 10.4× (better) |
| PEG | 0.79 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | 9.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $147.92 | $23.39 |
| Margin of safety | −34.7% | 11.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.6% (better) | 26.6% |
| Operating margin | 28.1% (better) | 6.0% |
| Net margin | 21.1% (better) | 2.4% |
| FCF margin | 19.8% (better) | 4.9% |
| Return on equity | 37.7% (better) | 6.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 25.7% (better) | 6.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 (better) | 0.89 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.29 (better) | 2.87 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.86 | 2.23 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.52 (better) | 1.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.25% | 1.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 85.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.51% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.4% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 1.0% | 11.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.9M | −$3.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- HWM stock overview
- HWM income statement
- HWM valuation and score
- NX stock overview
- NX income statement
- NX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.