ATI vs Howmet Aerospace
ATI and HWM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATI and HWM compare
Howmet Aerospace is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as ATI ($79.4B against $22.5B).
On earnings, Howmet Aerospace is cheaper: it trades at 39.0× trailing earnings, against 41.4× for ATI.
Howmet Aerospace grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.0% versus 9.4% for ATI).
Howmet Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.1% compared with 11.1% at ATI.
Howmet Aerospace pays a dividend yielding 0.25%; ATI does not pay one.
Howmet Aerospace scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for ATI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATI | HWM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $22.5B | $79.4B |
| Share price | $165.59 | $199.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 60.8% | −2.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 833% | 496% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 7,600 | 730 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.4× | 39.0× (better) |
| P/S | 4.5× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | 11.2× (better) | 13.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.0× (better) | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | 53.5× | 41.2× (better) |
| PEG | 4.86 | 0.79 (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 2.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $91.68 | $147.92 |
| Margin of safety | −80.6% | −34.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 22.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 9.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 24.9% | 41.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.4% | 43.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.5% | 36.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 16.5% | 28.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 21.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.4% | 19.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 29.9% | 37.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 20.2% | 25.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.93 | 0.77 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.41 | 1.29 (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.77 (better) | 1.86 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.98 | 8.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.25% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 85.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.86% | 1.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.86% | 1.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.2% | 91.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.91% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$82.6M | −$22.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- ATI stock overview
- ATI income statement
- ATI valuation and score
- HWM stock overview
- HWM income statement
- HWM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.