Howmet Aerospace vs Kaiser Aluminum
HWM and KALU side by side, both in rolling, drawing, and extruding of nonferrous. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HWM and KALU compare
Howmet Aerospace is the larger company, worth 42 times as much as Kaiser Aluminum ($79.4B against $1.9B).
On earnings, Kaiser Aluminum is cheaper: it trades at 8.6× trailing earnings, against 39.0× for Howmet Aerospace.
Kaiser Aluminum grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.8% versus 22.0% for Howmet Aerospace).
Howmet Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.1% compared with 5.5% at Kaiser Aluminum.
Both pay dividends: Howmet Aerospace yields 0.25% and Kaiser Aluminum 2.6%.
Kaiser Aluminum scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 17 for Howmet Aerospace), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HWM | KALU |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $79.4B | $1.9B |
| Share price | $199.22 | $116.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.1% | 25.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 496% | 8.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 730 | 3,840 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 39.0× | 8.6× (better) |
| P/S | 8.2× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 13.8× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 27.3× | 6.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 41.2× | 21.9× (better) |
| PEG | 0.79 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | 4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $147.92 | $264.35 |
| Margin of safety | −34.7% | 56.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.0% | 32.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 23.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.6% | 209% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.5% | 201% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 30.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.6% (better) | 14.5% |
| Operating margin | 28.1% (better) | 8.2% |
| Net margin | 21.1% (better) | 5.5% |
| FCF margin | 19.8% (better) | 2.1% |
| Return on equity | 37.7% (better) | 26.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 25.7% (better) | 13.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.29 (better) | 2.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.86 | 2.50 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.52 (better) | 2.92 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.25% | 2.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 85.6% (better) | 2.8% |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.9% | 2.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.4% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 1.0% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.9M | −$16.7M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- HWM stock overview
- HWM income statement
- HWM valuation and score
- KALU stock overview
- KALU income statement
- KALU valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.