Hancock Whitney vs Prosperity Bancshares
HWC and PB side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HWC and PB compare
Prosperity Bancshares is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Hancock Whitney ($8.7B against $5.8B).
On earnings, Prosperity Bancshares is cheaper: it trades at 12.5× trailing earnings, against 14.1× for Hancock Whitney.
Prosperity Bancshares grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.3% versus −0.24% for Hancock Whitney).
Prosperity Bancshares keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.4% compared with 29.1% at Hancock Whitney.
Both pay dividends: Hancock Whitney yields 2.7% and Prosperity Bancshares 3.3%.
Prosperity Bancshares scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Hancock Whitney), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HWC | PB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $71.99 | $71.98 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.8% | 10.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.0% | −7.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 3,627 | 3,941 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.1× | 12.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.9× (better) | 6.2× |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.3× (better) | 14.7× |
| FCF yield | 9.7% (better) | 6.8% |
| Fair value | $62.41 | $73.61 |
| Margin of safety | −15.3% | 2.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.24% | 13.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.6% (better) | 1.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −9.2% | 7.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.1% | 4.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 0.14% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 29.1% | 40.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 38.1% | 42.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.7% (better) | 7.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.35 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.27 | 0.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 37.0% | 41.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.4% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 73.7% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 3.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.6M | −$5.5M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- HWC stock overview
- HWC income statement
- HWC valuation and score
- PB stock overview
- PB income statement
- PB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.