Host Hotels & Resorts vs Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
HST and PEB side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HST and PEB compare
Host Hotels & Resorts is the larger company, worth 7.2 times as much as Pebblebrook Hotel Trust ($17.5B against $2.4B).
Host Hotels & Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.0% versus 2.8% for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust).
Host Hotels & Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.0% compared with −4.6% at Pebblebrook Hotel Trust.
Both pay dividends: Host Hotels & Resorts yields 6.5% and Pebblebrook Hotel Trust 0.19%.
Host Hotels & Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HST | PEB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.5B | $2.4B |
| Share price | $25.50 | $21.62 |
| Change, 1 year | 41.2% | 92.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.6% | −6.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 162 | 52 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.8× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.4× (better) | 47.8× |
| PEG | 2.43 | – |
| Fair value | $24.66 | $14.92 |
| Margin of safety | −3.4% (better) | −44.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.4% (better) | 27.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 26.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 34.4% |
| Operating margin | 14.8% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 15.0% (better) | −4.6% |
| Return on equity | 14.4% (better) | −2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.0% (better) | 1.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.9× (better) | 0.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 2.33 (better) | 0.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.5% (better) | 0.19% |
| Payout ratio | 122% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 36.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.43% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 128% |
| Held by insiders | 0.62% | 2.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.9M | $408K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 18.3% |
Go deeper
- HST stock overview
- HST income statement
- HST valuation and score
- PEB stock overview
- PEB income statement
- PEB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.