Honeywell International vs Textron
HON and TXT side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HON and TXT compare
Honeywell International is the larger company, worth 4.7 times as much as Textron ($69.2B against $14.7B).
On earnings, Honeywell International is cheaper: it trades at 8.5× trailing earnings, against 15.4× for Textron.
Textron grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 5.0% for Honeywell International).
Honeywell International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.6% compared with 6.3% at Textron.
Both pay dividends: Honeywell International yields 2.0% and Textron 0.09%.
Textron scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 16 for Honeywell International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HON | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $69.2B | $14.7B |
| Share price | $218.33 | $85.70 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.6% | 7.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −3.4% | 10.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 101K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.5× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/S | 1.8× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | 1.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.3× (better) | 18.2× |
| PEG | 20.62 | 1.83 (better) |
| FCF yield | 5.8% (better) | 5.5% |
| Fair value | $419.97 | $114.00 |
| Margin of safety | 48.0% (better) | 24.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.8% | 4.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 43.7% (better) | 17.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 46.6% (better) | 22.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 20.7% | – |
| Net margin | 21.6% (better) | 6.3% |
| FCF margin | 10.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Return on equity | 47.4% (better) | 12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.83 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.71 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.21 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.63 (better) | 2.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% (better) | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | 37.4% | 1.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 1.7% | 5.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.9% | 92.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.07% | 0.77% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.7M (better) | −$29.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- HON stock overview
- HON income statement
- HON valuation and score
- TXT stock overview
- TXT income statement
- TXT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.