Hilton Worldwide vs H World
HLT and HTHT side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HLT and HTHT compare
Hilton Worldwide grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.7% versus 5.9% for H World).
H World keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.1% compared with 12.7% at Hilton Worldwide.
Hilton Worldwide pays a dividend yielding 0.17%; H World does not pay one.
H World scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 10 for Hilton Worldwide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HLT | HTHT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $80.3B | – |
| Share price | $356.92 | $47.67 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.1% | 24.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 135% | 2.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 259K | 100K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 52.3× | – |
| P/S | 6.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 29.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 39.6× | – |
| PEG | 4.96 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | – |
| Fair value | $186.16 | – |
| Margin of safety | −91.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.7% (better) | 5.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.8% (better) | 19.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −0.31% | 66.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 66.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 26.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 12.7% | 20.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.3% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 38.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.7% | 97.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.30 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.97 (better) | −1.40 |
| Interest coverage | 4.4× | 20.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.65 | 1.21 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.20 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | – |
| Payout ratio | 8.8% | 76.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 32.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.2% | 5.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 32.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$38.7M | −$1.6M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | – |
Go deeper
- HLT stock overview
- HLT income statement
- HLT valuation and score
- HTHT stock overview
- HTHT income statement
- HTHT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.