Hawaiian Electric Industries vs Idacorp
HE and IDA side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HE and IDA compare
Idacorp is the larger company, worth 5.6 times as much as Hawaiian Electric Industries ($8.4B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Hawaiian Electric Industries is cheaper: it trades at 6.7× trailing earnings, against 24.6× for Idacorp.
Hawaiian Electric Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus −1.2% for Idacorp).
Idacorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.5% compared with 6.9% at Hawaiian Electric Industries.
Idacorp pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Hawaiian Electric Industries does not pay one.
Hawaiian Electric Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Idacorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HE | IDA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $8.4B |
| Share price | $8.70 | $145.38 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.7% | 8.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.9% | 38.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.58 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 2,203 | 2,174 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.7× (better) | 24.6× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 4.8× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 2.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.9× (better) | 19.7× |
| PEG | – | 5.02 |
| FCF yield | −37.6% | −6.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $27.37 | $102.70 |
| Margin of safety | 68.2% (better) | −41.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% (better) | −1.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.7% | 6.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 11.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 7.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −17.1% | 4.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 20.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.9% | 18.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −17.2% (better) | −33.1% |
| Return on equity | 13.7% (better) | 8.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | 4.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.95 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.35 | 6.00 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.8× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.99 | 1.18 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.59 | 1.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 58.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 10 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | −1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.8% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 0.32% | 0.42% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$963K |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 11.0% |
Go deeper
- HE stock overview
- HE income statement
- HE valuation and score
- IDA stock overview
- IDA income statement
- IDA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.