GXO Logistics vs Ryder System
GXO and R side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GXO and R compare
Ryder System is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as GXO Logistics ($10.8B against $5.8B).
On earnings, Ryder System is cheaper: it trades at 23.0× trailing earnings, against 44.5× for GXO Logistics.
GXO Logistics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.6% versus 1.1% for Ryder System).
Ryder System keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with 0.96% at GXO Logistics.
Ryder System pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; GXO Logistics does not pay one.
Ryder System scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for GXO Logistics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GXO | R |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $10.8B |
| Share price | $50.27 | $282.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.9% | 65.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −46.2% | 224% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.42 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 154K | 52K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 44.5× | 23.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× | 5.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 32.0× | 15.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.1% | 6.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $48.39 | $156.13 |
| Margin of safety | −3.9% (better) | −81.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.6% (better) | 1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 8.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 108% (better) | −2.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 113% (better) | 4.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 2.4% | – |
| Net margin | 0.96% | 3.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.3% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.4% | 16.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.07 (better) | 2.59 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.05 | 2.19 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.79 (better) | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.56 (better) | 1.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.0% |
| Buyback yield | 0.31% | 5.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.31% | 6.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 91.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $304K (better) | −$41.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.6% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- GXO stock overview
- GXO income statement
- GXO valuation and score
- R stock overview
- R income statement
- R valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.