Ryder System vs U-Haul
R and UHAL side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How R and UHAL compare
Ryder System and U-Haul are about the same size, with market caps of $10.8B and $11.2B.
Ryder System keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.9% compared with 2.3% at U-Haul.
Ryder System pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; U-Haul does not pay one.
Ryder System scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for U-Haul), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | R | UHAL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.8B | $11.2B |
| Share price | $282.55 | $57.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 65.4% | 7.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 224% | −24.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 52K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.8× |
| P/B | 3.8× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.5× (better) | 23.7× |
| P/FCF | 15.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.3% (better) | −11.0% |
| Fair value | $156.13 | $38.48 |
| Margin of safety | −81.0% | −49.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.1% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 96.0% |
| Operating margin | – | 7.0% |
| Net margin | 3.9% (better) | 2.3% |
| FCF margin | 5.4% (better) | −20.3% |
| Return on equity | 16.7% (better) | 1.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 4.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.59 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.19 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.65 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.40 (better) | 1.35 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 29.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | 5.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.0% | 37.3% |
| Held by insiders | 4.0% | 88.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$41.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | – |
Go deeper
- R stock overview
- R income statement
- R valuation and score
- UHAL stock overview
- UHAL income statement
- UHAL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.