Great Southern Bancorp vs South Plains Financial
GSBC and SPFI side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GSBC and SPFI compare
Great Southern Bancorp and South Plains Financial are about the same size, with market caps of $886M and $806M.
On earnings, South Plains Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 14.2× for Great Southern Bancorp.
South Plains Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.3% versus −3.1% for Great Southern Bancorp).
South Plains Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.3% compared with 28.6% at Great Southern Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Great Southern Bancorp yields 2.1% and South Plains Financial 1.7%.
South Plains Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Great Southern Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GSBC | SPFI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $886M | $806M |
| Share price | $81.28 | $42.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.8% | 13.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 40.9% | 63.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.54 |
| Employees | 1,075 | 603 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.2× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 4.0× | 3.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 13.9× | 9.7× (better) |
| PEG | 15.26 | 5.35 (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.2% | 10.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $66.90 | $41.02 |
| Margin of safety | −21.5% | −4.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.1% | 13.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.6% (better) | −1.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −8.7% | 16.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −4.8% | 7.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.0% (better) | 6.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 28.6% | 29.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 28.6% | 35.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.2% | 12.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 0.14 | 0.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | 29.8% | 17.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −6.8% | 34.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.9% (better) | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.6% | 46.5% |
| Held by insiders | 16.1% | 22.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.0M (better) | −$15.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- GSBC stock overview
- GSBC income statement
- GSBC valuation and score
- SPFI stock overview
- SPFI income statement
- SPFI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.