Gold.com vs Reliance
GOLD and RS side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOLD and RS compare
Reliance is the larger company, worth 21 times as much as Gold.com ($22.1B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Gold.com is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 20.2× for Reliance.
Gold.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (110% versus 24.7% for Reliance).
Reliance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.4% compared with 0.34% at Gold.com.
Both pay dividends: Gold.com yields 4.9% and Reliance 1.1%.
Gold.com scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for Reliance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOLD | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $22.1B |
| Share price | $36.40 | $433.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.9% | 60.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.6% | 168% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 1,355 | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 20.2× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8× (better) | 13.0× |
| P/FCF | 2.8× (better) | 44.9× |
| FCF yield | 35.2% (better) | 2.2% |
| Fair value | $68.71 | $317.36 |
| Margin of safety | 47.0% (better) | −36.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 110% (better) | 24.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.4% (better) | 10.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1048% (better) | 52.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 975% (better) | 56.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.4% | 19.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 1.9% | 28.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 8.8% |
| Net margin | 0.34% | 6.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 2.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.4% | 14.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.21 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.61 | 0.77 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 22.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.15 | 4.12 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.25 (better) | 6.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.9% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | 62.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 15 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.3% | 82.5% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 0.42% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.6M (better) | −$19.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.8% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- GOLD stock overview
- GOLD income statement
- GOLD valuation and score
- RS stock overview
- RS income statement
- RS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.