GameStop vs Take Two Interactive Software
GME and TTWO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GME and TTWO compare
Take Two Interactive Software is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as GameStop ($35.6B against $12.2B).
Take Two Interactive Software grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus −7.7% for GameStop).
GameStop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.2% compared with −4.8% at Take Two Interactive Software.
GameStop scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 6 for Take Two Interactive Software), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GME | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.2B | $35.6B |
| Share price | $24.23 | $190.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.6% | −24.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.6% | 1.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.23 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.9× | – |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 5.3× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 9.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.6× (better) | 1036× |
| P/FCF | 17.8× (better) | 105× |
| FCF yield | 5.6% (better) | 0.95% |
| Fair value | $33.68 | $112.12 |
| Margin of safety | 28.1% (better) | −69.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.7% | 15.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.5% | 14.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 147% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 108% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.9% | 56.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.5% (better) | −2.4% |
| Net margin | 25.2% (better) | −4.8% |
| FCF margin | 19.4% (better) | 5.0% |
| Return on equity | 15.8% (better) | −9.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.4% (better) | −2.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 (better) | 0.70 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.86 | 19.80 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −1.1× |
| Current ratio | 8.72 (better) | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.60 | 3.47 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −0.17% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.17% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 31.6% | 93.2% |
| Held by insiders | 10.1% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $79.8M (better) | −$163M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.4% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- GME stock overview
- GME income statement
- GME valuation and score
- TTWO stock overview
- TTWO income statement
- TTWO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.