StockData

Guardant Health vs RadNet

GH and RDNT side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GH and RDNT compare

Guardant Health is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as RadNet ($20.8B against $6.1B).

Guardant Health grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.7% versus 21.1% for RadNet).

RadNet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.94% compared with −37.9% at Guardant Health.

Guardant Health scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for RadNet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGHRDNT
Size and price
Market cap$20.8B$6.1B
Share price$154.78$78.08
Change, 1 year58.1%−3.4%
Change, 5 years58.6%176%
Beta (5Y)1.621.16
Employees2,50676
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score12 (better)
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S16.2×2.6× (better)
P/B–5.5×
EV/EBITDA–27.9×
FCF yield−1.1%–
Fair value–$55.32
Margin of safety–−41.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)41.7% (better)21.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average27.9% (better)13.7%
Profitability
Gross margin65.2%–
Operating margin−39.4%3.1% (better)
Net margin−37.9%−0.94% (better)
FCF margin−18.2%–
Return on equity–−2.1%
Return on invested capital–2.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity–1.18
Net debt / EBITDA–2.28
Interest coverage−96.6×1.0× (better)
Current ratio3.60 (better)1.49
Altman Z-score3.69 (better)1.97
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions99.8%104%
Held by insiders1.8%4.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$173M−$8.4M (better)
Short interest, % of float7.2%11.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.