StockData

Natera vs RadNet

NTRA and RDNT side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NTRA and RDNT compare

Natera is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as RadNet ($59.7B against $5.8B).

Natera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.8% versus 18.9% for RadNet).

RadNet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.93% compared with −7.1% at Natera.

Natera scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for RadNet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNTRARDNT
Size and price
Market cap$59.7B$5.8B
Share price$414.30$73.49
Change, 1 year115%−6.8%
Change, 5 years257%112%
Beta (5Y)1.341.18
Employees6,14076
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score22
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S22.1×2.5× (better)
P/B32.8×5.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA–27.6×
P/FCF709×–
FCF yield0.14%–
Fair value$124.09$54.24
Margin of safety−234%−35.5% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)37.8% (better)18.9%
Revenue growth, 5Y average42.6% (better)13.7%
Profitability
Operating margin−10.7%3.1% (better)
Net margin−7.1%−0.93% (better)
FCF margin3.1%–
Return on equity−12.5%−2.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−40.8%2.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04 (better)1.22
Net debt / EBITDA–2.51
Interest coverage−75.9×1.0× (better)
Current ratio3.00 (better)1.48
Altman Z-score42.48 (better)1.87
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions95.2%104%
Held by insiders4.0%4.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$371M−$12.3M (better)
Superinvestors holding3–
Short interest, % of float4.6%12.5%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.