GCM Grosvenor vs Blue Owl Capital
GCMG and OWL side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GCMG and OWL compare
Blue Owl Capital is the larger company, worth 6.3 times as much as GCM Grosvenor ($16.1B against $2.6B).
Blue Owl Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus 7.0% for GCM Grosvenor).
GCM Grosvenor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.8% compared with 7.7% at Blue Owl Capital.
Both pay dividends: GCM Grosvenor yields 3.8% and Blue Owl Capital 8.8%.
GCM Grosvenor scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Blue Owl Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GCMG | OWL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $16.1B |
| Share price | $12.64 | $10.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.4% | −37.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 5.8% | −39.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 1.70 |
| Employees | 553 | 1,365 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 73.8× |
| P/S | 4.5× (better) | 13.1× |
| P/B | 101× | 8.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 13.8× | 10.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.3% | 9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $10.17 | $5.78 |
| Margin of safety | −24.2% (better) | −78.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 17.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 60.8% | 82.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 133% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 27.1% | – |
| Net margin | 7.8% (better) | 7.7% |
| FCF margin | 32.6% | 122% (better) |
| Return on equity | 682% (better) | 4.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 4.33 (better) | 1.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.8% | 8.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 650% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.48% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% | 9.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 27.2% | 41.4% |
| Held by insiders | – | 65.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$10.2M | $7.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 19.5% |
Go deeper
- GCMG stock overview
- GCMG income statement
- GCMG valuation and score
- OWL stock overview
- OWL income statement
- OWL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.