Blue Owl Capital vs Victory Capital
OWL and VCTR side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OWL and VCTR compare
Blue Owl Capital is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Victory Capital ($16.1B against $6.8B).
On earnings, Victory Capital is cheaper: it trades at 20.3× trailing earnings, against 73.8× for Blue Owl Capital.
Victory Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (51.5% versus 8.1% for Blue Owl Capital).
Victory Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.6% compared with 7.7% at Blue Owl Capital.
Both pay dividends: Blue Owl Capital yields 8.8% and Victory Capital 1.8%.
Victory Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Blue Owl Capital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OWL | VCTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.1B | $6.8B |
| Share price | $10.33 | $110.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.6% | 75.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.5% | 161% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.70 | 1.11 |
| Employees | 1,365 | 699 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 73.8× | 20.3× (better) |
| P/S | 13.1× | 4.4× (better) |
| P/B | 8.4× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.2× |
| P/FCF | 10.7× (better) | 12.1× |
| PEG | – | 8.78 |
| FCF yield | 9.3% (better) | 8.3% |
| Fair value | $5.78 | $94.13 |
| Margin of safety | −78.6% | −17.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.1% | 51.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.8% (better) | 11.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 82.2% (better) | 64.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 133% (better) | 34.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 41.3% |
| Net margin | 7.7% | 29.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 122% (better) | 36.2% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 19.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 21.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 10.9× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.29 | 3.58 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.8% (better) | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | 650% | 36.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 53.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.48% | 5.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 9.3% (better) | 7.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.4% | 79.4% |
| Held by insiders | 65.3% | 96.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.1M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.5% | 135% |
Go deeper
- OWL stock overview
- OWL income statement
- OWL valuation and score
- VCTR stock overview
- VCTR income statement
- VCTR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.