Gap vs Victoria's Secret
GAP and VSXY side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GAP and VSXY compare
Gap and Victoria's Secret are about the same size, with market caps of $7.8B and $7.7B.
On earnings, Gap is cheaper: it trades at 6.7× trailing earnings, against 22.6× for Victoria's Secret.
Victoria's Secret grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus 1.1% for Gap).
Gap keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.1% compared with 5.5% at Victoria's Secret.
Gap pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; Victoria's Secret does not pay one.
Gap scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for Victoria's Secret), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GAP | VSXY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $22.32 | $96.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.8% | 167% |
| Change, 5 years | −10.3% | 88.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.46 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 79K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.7× (better) | 22.6× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.1× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 7.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.1× (better) | 10.8× |
| P/FCF | 8.2× (better) | 13.9× |
| FCF yield | 12.2% (better) | 7.2% |
| Fair value | $38.92 | $53.62 |
| Margin of safety | 42.6% (better) | −80.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.1% | 10.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | 3.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 40.3% | 150% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 43.3% | 166% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.3% (better) | 39.6% |
| Operating margin | 11.0% (better) | 7.9% |
| Net margin | 8.1% (better) | 5.5% |
| FCF margin | 6.2% | 8.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 33.8% | 45.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 45.2% (better) | 28.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.38 (better) | 0.98 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.45 | 0.60 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 18.1× (better) | 8.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.82 (better) | 1.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.82 | 3.11 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 20.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 22.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 10.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.8% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 40.9% | 11.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$60.1M (better) | −$212M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.4% | 14.4% |
Go deeper
- GAP stock overview
- GAP income statement
- GAP valuation and score
- VSXY stock overview
- VSXY income statement
- VSXY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.