StockData

Fortrea vs RadNet

FTRE and RDNT side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FTRE and RDNT compare

RadNet is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Fortrea ($6.1B against $2.0B).

RadNet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.1% versus −3.4% for Fortrea).

RadNet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.94% compared with −2.6% at Fortrea.

RadNet scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Fortrea), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFTRERDNT
Size and price
Market cap$2.0B$6.1B
Share price$20.38$78.08
Change, 1 year82.3%−3.4%
Change, 5 years–176%
Beta (5Y)1.471.16
Employees14K76
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score22
Health score03 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.7× (better)2.6×
P/B3.7× (better)5.5×
EV/EBITDA30.6×27.9× (better)
P/FCF11.6×–
FCF yield8.6%–
Fair value$16.16$55.32
Margin of safety−26.1% (better)−41.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−3.4%21.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–13.7%
Profitability
Gross margin20.0%–
Operating margin0.48%3.1% (better)
Net margin−2.6%−0.94% (better)
FCF margin6.3%–
Return on equity−12.3%−2.1% (better)
Return on invested capital0.69%2.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity1.981.18 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA9.122.28 (better)
Interest coverage–1.0×
Current ratio0.971.49 (better)
Altman Z-score0.791.97 (better)
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions104%104%
Held by insiders3.9%4.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$4.7M (better)−$8.4M
Short interest, % of float9.2%11.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.