FirstSun Capital Bancorp vs Zions Bancorporation, National Association
FSUN and ZION side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FSUN and ZION compare
Zions Bancorporation, National Association is the larger company, worth 5.2 times as much as FirstSun Capital Bancorp ($9.5B against $1.8B).
On earnings, Zions Bancorporation, National Association is cheaper: it trades at 8.3× trailing earnings, against 19.9× for FirstSun Capital Bancorp.
FirstSun Capital Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.3% versus 5.8% for Zions Bancorporation, National Association).
Zions Bancorporation, National Association keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 169% compared with 9.1% at FirstSun Capital Bancorp.
Zions Bancorporation, National Association pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; FirstSun Capital Bancorp does not pay one.
Zions Bancorporation, National Association scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 9 for FirstSun Capital Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FSUN | ZION |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.8B | $9.5B |
| Share price | $39.17 | $65.37 |
| Change, 1 year | 17.0% | 26.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 0.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 1,186 | 9,195 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× | 8.3× (better) |
| P/S | 3.6× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/FCF | 1.6× (better) | 5.7× |
| PEG | 1.68 (better) | 6.66 |
| FCF yield | 63.4% (better) | 17.6% |
| Fair value | $34.29 | $75.75 |
| Margin of safety | −14.2% | 13.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.3% (better) | 5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.1% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −47.4% | 38.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −37.1% | 43.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.1% | 14.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 9.1% | 169% (better) |
| FCF margin | 226% | 242% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.2% | 16.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.25 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.17 | 0.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.3% |
| Buyback yield | 0.08% | 1.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.08% | 4.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 52.9% | 83.6% |
| Held by insiders | 14.3% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $52.9K (better) | −$9.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | – |
Go deeper
- FSUN stock overview
- FSUN income statement
- FSUN valuation and score
- ZION stock overview
- ZION income statement
- ZION valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.