Federal Signal vs Winnebago Industries
FSS and WGO side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FSS and WGO compare
Federal Signal is the larger company, worth 8.0 times as much as Winnebago Industries ($7.0B against $881M).
On earnings, Federal Signal is cheaper: it trades at 23.9× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for Winnebago Industries.
Federal Signal grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.0% versus −3.4% for Winnebago Industries).
Federal Signal keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.7% compared with 1.3% at Winnebago Industries.
Both pay dividends: Federal Signal yields 0.51% and Winnebago Industries 4.6%.
Federal Signal scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 12 for Winnebago Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FSS | WGO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | $881M |
| Share price | $115.36 | $30.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.8% | −9.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 154% | −57.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 5,800 | 5,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.9× (better) | 25.6× |
| P/S | 2.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 4.5× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× | 9.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 19.3× | 6.1× (better) |
| PEG | 0.90 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.2% | 16.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $91.19 | $29.20 |
| Margin of safety | −26.5% | −6.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.0% (better) | −3.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.0% (better) | −5.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.9% | 34.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.8% | 33.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 20.8% (better) | −31.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.1% (better) | 13.0% |
| Operating margin | 16.2% (better) | 2.4% |
| Net margin | 11.7% (better) | 1.3% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% (better) | 5.3% |
| Return on equity | 20.5% (better) | 2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | 3.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.27 (better) | 0.36 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.68 (better) | 2.08 |
| Interest coverage | 17.9× (better) | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.97 (better) | 2.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.57 (better) | 3.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.51% | 4.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 12.1% | 116% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | 16.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.07% | 0.19% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.58% | 4.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 102% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 7.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.1M | −$989K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.1% | 13.5% |
Go deeper
- FSS stock overview
- FSS income statement
- FSS valuation and score
- WGO stock overview
- WGO income statement
- WGO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.