Flowserve vs Gorman Rupp
FLS and GRC side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLS and GRC compare
Flowserve is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Gorman Rupp ($10.0B against $1.9B).
On earnings, Flowserve is cheaper: it trades at 27.7× trailing earnings, against 30.4× for Gorman Rupp.
Both pay dividends: Flowserve yields 1.1% and Gorman Rupp 1.1%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLS | GRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.0B | $1.9B |
| Share price | $79.01 | $71.93 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | 61.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 129% | 54.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 16K | 1,415 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 13 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.7× (better) | 30.4× |
| P/S | – | 2.7× |
| P/B | 4.4× | 4.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.6× | 17.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 24.4× | 18.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.24 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.1% | 5.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $61.82 | $61.18 |
| Margin of safety | −27.8% | −17.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 14.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.3% (better) | 20.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.0% (better) | 20.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 31.4% |
| Operating margin | – | 14.8% |
| Net margin | – | 8.9% |
| FCF margin | – | 14.3% |
| Return on equity | 16.6% (better) | 14.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.2% | 11.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.94 | 0.62 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.88 | 1.86 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 4.6× | 5.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.15 | 2.81 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.00 | 4.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | 29.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.98% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.14% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 66.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.62% | 14.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.9M | −$400K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.2% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- FLS stock overview
- FLS income statement
- FLS valuation and score
- GRC stock overview
- GRC income statement
- GRC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.