Flowserve vs ITT
FLS and ITT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLS and ITT compare
ITT is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Flowserve ($17.7B against $10.0B).
On earnings, Flowserve is cheaper: it trades at 27.7× trailing earnings, against 38.9× for ITT.
Both pay dividends: Flowserve yields 1.1% and ITT 0.76%.
Flowserve scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for ITT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLS | ITT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.0B | $17.7B |
| Share price | $79.01 | $198.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.6% | 1.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 129% | 90.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.28 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 16K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.7× (better) | 38.9× |
| P/S | – | 3.7× |
| P/B | 4.4× | 3.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.6× | 23.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 24.4× (better) | 34.8× |
| PEG | 1.24 (better) | 3.32 |
| FCF yield | 4.1% (better) | 2.9% |
| Fair value | $61.82 | $127.50 |
| Margin of safety | −27.8% (better) | −55.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | 28.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 9.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.3% (better) | −18.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.0% (better) | −19.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.4% | 49.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 35.2% |
| Operating margin | – | 14.4% |
| Net margin | – | 8.9% |
| FCF margin | – | 10.8% |
| Return on equity | 16.6% (better) | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.2% (better) | 8.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.94 | 0.78 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.88 (better) | 3.49 |
| Interest coverage | 4.6× | 6.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.15 (better) | 1.26 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.00 (better) | 2.80 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.76% |
| Payout ratio | 29.4% | 29.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.98% | 15.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.70% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 1.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.62% | 0.60% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$19.9M | −$12.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.2% | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- FLS stock overview
- FLS income statement
- FLS valuation and score
- ITT stock overview
- ITT income statement
- ITT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.