StockData

Fluent vs Star Fashion Culture

FLNT and STFS side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLNT and STFS compare

Star Fashion Culture grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (74.0% versus −12.0% for Fluent).

Fluent keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −11.5% compared with −13.7% at Star Fashion Culture.

Star Fashion Culture scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for Fluent), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLNTSTFS
Size and price
Market cap$109M–
Share price$3.46$4.52
Change, 1 year77.4%−34.6%
Change, 5 years−73.8%–
Beta (5Y)1.08−0.16
Employees18619
StockData Score
Total score26 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score11
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B13.5×–
FCF yield−4.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−12.0%74.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−7.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin26.5% (better)7.7%
Operating margin−7.4% (better)−16.2%
Net margin−11.5% (better)−13.7%
FCF margin−2.1%–
Return on equity−170%−39.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−33.6% (better)−35.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.940.04 (better)
Interest coverage−5.5× (better)−207.7×
Current ratio0.883.29 (better)
Altman Z-score−5.48–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions13.9%0.00%
Held by insiders67.5%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$858K$2.6M (better)
Short interest, % of float0.58%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.