StockData

Fluent vs Star Fashion Culture

FLNT and STFS side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLNT and STFS compare

Star Fashion Culture grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (74.0% versus −1.7% for Fluent).

Fluent keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9.0% compared with −13.7% at Star Fashion Culture.

Star Fashion Culture scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Fluent), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLNTSTFS
Size and price
Market cap$98.6M–
Share price$3.12$4.86
Change, 1 year60.0%−32.5%
Change, 5 years−76.4%–
Beta (5Y)1.06−0.15
Employees18619
StockData Score
Total score36 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B17.7×–
P/FCF18.2×–
FCF yield5.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.7%74.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−7.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin27.8% (better)7.7%
Operating margin−5.7% (better)−16.2%
Net margin−9.0% (better)−13.7%
FCF margin2.6%–
Return on equity−138%−39.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−27.3% (better)−35.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity6.430.04 (better)
Interest coverage−4.3× (better)−207.7×
Current ratio0.843.29 (better)
Altman Z-score−5.08–
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions13.9%0.00%
Held by insiders67.5%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$858K$2.6M (better)
Short interest, % of float0.58%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.