Fidelity National Information Services vs RELX
FIS and RELX side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIS and RELX compare
Fidelity National Information Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.3% versus 1.7% for RELX).
Fidelity National Information Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.6% compared with 21.5% at RELX.
Fidelity National Information Services pays a dividend yielding 4.5%; RELX does not pay one.
Fidelity National Information Services scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 8 for RELX), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIS | RELX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $19.9B | – |
| Share price | $38.55 | $40.09 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.3% | −10.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −66.1% | 26.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 44K | 37K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 5.9× | – |
| P/S | 1.6× | – |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.7× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 14.2% | – |
| Fair value | $71.41 | – |
| Margin of safety | 46.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.2% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 2911% (better) | 6.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 3517% (better) | 8.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 23.9% (better) | 12.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.9% | 66.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 31.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 27.6% (better) | 21.5% |
| FCF margin | 23.1% | 29.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 22.3% | 70.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.6% | 81.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.32 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.92 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.2× | 10.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.53 (better) | 0.49 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.07 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 25.9% | 57.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.1% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.9% | 4.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | – |
Go deeper
- FIS stock overview
- FIS income statement
- FIS valuation and score
- RELX stock overview
- RELX income statement
- RELX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.