Broadridge Financial Solutions vs Fidelity National Information Services
BR and FIS side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BR and FIS compare
Broadridge Financial Solutions and Fidelity National Information Services are about the same size, with market caps of $20.4B and $19.9B.
On earnings, Fidelity National Information Services is cheaper: it trades at 5.9× trailing earnings, against 18.6× for Broadridge Financial Solutions.
Fidelity National Information Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.3% versus 8.5% for Broadridge Financial Solutions).
Fidelity National Information Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.6% compared with 15.0% at Broadridge Financial Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Broadridge Financial Solutions yields 2.2% and Fidelity National Information Services 4.5%.
Broadridge Financial Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 17 for Fidelity National Information Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BR | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.4B | $19.9B |
| Share price | $178.82 | $38.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.7% | −37.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.9% | −66.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 16K | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 23 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.6× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/S | 2.7× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 7.2× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.2× | 9.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 15.9× | 7.0× (better) |
| PEG | 0.85 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.3% | 14.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $234.43 | $71.41 |
| Margin of safety | 23.7% | 46.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 18.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% (better) | −3.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.9% | 2911% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.2% | 3517% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.6% | 23.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | 35.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.4% (better) | 15.7% |
| Net margin | 15.0% | 27.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.1% | 23.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 40.9% (better) | 22.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | 4.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.15 (better) | 1.32 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.98 (better) | 4.92 |
| Interest coverage | 11.6× (better) | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 (better) | 0.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.08 (better) | 0.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 4.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 39.4% | 25.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.1% (better) | 2.7% |
| Buyback yield | 3.0% | 3.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% | 8.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.47% | 0.13% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.6M | $1.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- BR stock overview
- BR income statement
- BR valuation and score
- FIS stock overview
- FIS income statement
- FIS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.