FTAI Infrastructure vs Union Pacific
FIP and UNP side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIP and UNP compare
Union Pacific is the larger company, worth 534 times as much as FTAI Infrastructure ($181B against $338M).
FTAI Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (72.3% versus 4.2% for Union Pacific).
Both pay dividends: FTAI Infrastructure yields 4.2% and Union Pacific 1.8%.
Union Pacific scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for FTAI Infrastructure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $338M | $181B |
| Share price | $2.86 | $304.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.7% | 40.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 27.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.38 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 1,110 | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.6× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 7.1× |
| P/B | – | 8.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 20.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 27.8× |
| PEG | – | 10.99 |
| FCF yield | −94.3% | 3.6% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $231.58 |
| Margin of safety | – | −31.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 72.3% (better) | 4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 48.9% (better) | 4.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 5.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 7.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 40.0% |
| Net margin | – | 28.8% |
| FCF margin | −48.3% | 25.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 39.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.47 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.82 |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.28 | 0.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.23 | 4.38 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 44.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% (better) | 1.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.3% | 89.2% |
| Held by insiders | 38.2% | 0.13% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $45.8K (better) | −$9.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 8 |
| Short interest, % of float | 25.5% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- FIP stock overview
- FIP income statement
- FIP valuation and score
- UNP stock overview
- UNP income statement
- UNP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.