FTAI Infrastructure vs Foster L B
FIP and FSTR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIP and FSTR compare
FTAI Infrastructure is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Foster L B ($518M against $445M).
FTAI Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.7% versus 15.8% for Foster L B).
FTAI Infrastructure pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Foster L B does not pay one.
Foster L B scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for FTAI Infrastructure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIP | FSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $518M | $445M |
| Share price | $4.38 | $42.31 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.3% | 50.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 152% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 1,110 | 1,191 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 32.8× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 10.7× |
| FCF yield | −56.3% | 9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $36.11 |
| Margin of safety | – | −17.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 67.7% (better) | 15.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 48.9% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 182% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 187% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.57% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 20.9% |
| Operating margin | – | 4.4% |
| Net margin | – | 2.3% |
| FCF margin | −39.5% | 7.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 7.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.15 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.57 |
| Current ratio | 0.22 | 1.89 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.26 | 5.15 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.3% | 79.0% |
| Held by insiders | 38.2% | 21.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $64.8K (better) | −$6.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 24.4% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- FIP stock overview
- FIP income statement
- FIP valuation and score
- FSTR stock overview
- FSTR income statement
- FSTR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.