FactSet Research Systems vs SS&C Technologies
FDS and SSNC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FDS and SSNC compare
SS&C Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as FactSet Research Systems ($18.9B against $11.7B).
On earnings, FactSet Research Systems is cheaper: it trades at 21.7× trailing earnings, against 23.2× for SS&C Technologies.
SS&C Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus 6.6% for FactSet Research Systems).
FactSet Research Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.2% compared with 13.2% at SS&C Technologies.
Both pay dividends: FactSet Research Systems yields 1.4% and SS&C Technologies 1.4%.
FactSet Research Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 16 for SS&C Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FDS | SSNC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.7B | $18.9B |
| Share price | $329.57 | $80.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.5% | −3.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.3% | 3.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 13K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 21.7× (better) | 23.2× |
| P/S | 4.8× | 2.9× (better) |
| P/B | 5.8× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.3× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.5× | 10.8× (better) |
| PEG | 1.46 (better) | 2.79 |
| FCF yield | 6.0% | 9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $425.79 | $92.65 |
| Margin of safety | 22.6% (better) | 13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.6% | 8.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.2% (better) | 6.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.2% | 7.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 9.6% (better) | 9.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | 6.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 51.4% (better) | 48.1% |
| Operating margin | 29.6% (better) | 23.6% |
| Net margin | 23.2% (better) | 13.2% |
| FCF margin | 29.0% (better) | 26.7% |
| Return on equity | 27.0% (better) | 12.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.5% (better) | 9.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 (better) | 1.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.21 (better) | 3.15 |
| Interest coverage | 13.6× (better) | 3.6× |
| Current ratio | 0.68 | 1.06 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.18 (better) | 1.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 29.0% | 30.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.4% |
| Buyback yield | 5.2% | 6.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 86.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.47% | 15.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M (better) | −$13.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- FDS stock overview
- FDS income statement
- FDS valuation and score
- SSNC stock overview
- SSNC income statement
- SSNC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.