Ezcorp vs GameStop
EZPW and GME side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EZPW and GME compare
GameStop is the larger company, worth 7.1 times as much as Ezcorp ($12.2B against $1.7B).
On earnings, Ezcorp is cheaper: it trades at 14.3× trailing earnings, against 15.9× for GameStop.
Ezcorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.6% versus −7.7% for GameStop).
GameStop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.2% compared with 10.0% at Ezcorp.
Ezcorp scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for GameStop), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EZPW | GME |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.7B | $12.2B |
| Share price | $28.11 | $24.23 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.3% | 3.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 260% | −54.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 1.23 |
| Employees | 8,500 | 4,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.3× (better) | 15.9× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 3.4× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 23.6× |
| P/FCF | 12.5× (better) | 17.8× |
| PEG | 0.54 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.0% (better) | 5.6% |
| Fair value | $32.63 | $33.68 |
| Margin of safety | 13.9% | 28.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.6% (better) | −7.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% (better) | −6.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 61.4% | 147% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 56.8% | 108% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.6% (better) | 37.9% |
| Operating margin | 13.9% (better) | 13.5% |
| Net margin | 10.0% | 25.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.7% | 19.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.7% | 15.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.7% (better) | 13.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.45 (better) | 0.68 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.81 (better) | −1.86 |
| Interest coverage | 6.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.81 | 8.72 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.07 (better) | 2.60 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.52% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.52% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 31.6% |
| Held by insiders | 5.2% | 10.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.7M | $79.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 21.2% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- EZPW stock overview
- EZPW income statement
- EZPW valuation and score
- GME stock overview
- GME income statement
- GME valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.