Expand Energy vs Woodside Energy
EXE and WDS side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EXE and WDS compare
Expand Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.2% versus −1.5% for Woodside Energy).
Woodside Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.9% compared with 19.8% at Expand Energy.
Expand Energy pays a dividend yielding 3.3%; Woodside Energy does not pay one.
Expand Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Woodside Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EXE | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.3B | – |
| Share price | $87.80 | $21.24 |
| Change, 1 year | −26.0% | 20.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 42.2% | 36.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 4,667 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.6× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | – |
| P/B | 1.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 7.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 12.8% | – |
| Fair value | $101.96 | – |
| Margin of safety | 13.9% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.2% (better) | −1.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.3% | 29.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 218% (better) | −23.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 228% (better) | −24.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 34.9% |
| Operating margin | 25.7% | 30.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.8% | 20.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 14.6% (better) | 7.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.2% (better) | 7.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 (better) | 0.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | 0.70 |
| Interest coverage | 17.4× (better) | 13.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.90 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.31 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 19.9% | 74.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 24.1% |
| Buyback yield | 4.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.5% | 1.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.33% | 0.03% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $877K (better) | −$535K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | – |
Go deeper
- EXE stock overview
- EXE income statement
- EXE valuation and score
- WDS stock overview
- WDS income statement
- WDS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.