EquipmentShare.com vs Upbound
EQPT and UPBD side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQPT and UPBD compare
EquipmentShare.com is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Upbound ($4.4B against $1.2B).
On earnings, Upbound is cheaper: it trades at 13.4× trailing earnings, against 1718× for EquipmentShare.com.
EquipmentShare.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus 5.9% for Upbound).
Upbound keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.9% compared with 0.91% at EquipmentShare.com.
Upbound pays a dividend yielding 7.5%; EquipmentShare.com does not pay one.
Upbound scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 3 for EquipmentShare.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQPT | UPBD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $17.18 | $20.70 |
| Change, 1 year | – | −10.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −52.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.37 |
| Employees | 8,206 | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1718× | 13.4× (better) |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 3.6× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.4× | 4.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 3.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.17 |
| FCF yield | – | 29.5% |
| Fair value | $12.25 | $29.19 |
| Margin of safety | −40.3% | 29.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.3% (better) | 5.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 10.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1233% (better) | −11.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −13.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −19.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net margin | 0.91% | 1.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 7.5% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 12.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 27.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.82 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× | 2.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.42 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.44 | 2.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.5% |
| Payout ratio | 92.5% | 100% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.6% | 99.3% |
| Held by insiders | 43.4% | 3.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$40.7M | −$53.0K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.5% | 16.0% |
Go deeper
- EQPT stock overview
- EQPT income statement
- EQPT valuation and score
- UPBD stock overview
- UPBD income statement
- UPBD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.