Enterprise Products Partners L.P. vs Plains All American Pipeline LP
EPD and PAA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EPD and PAA compare
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Plains All American Pipeline LP ($82.4B against $18.7B).
Plains All American Pipeline LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.2% versus 6.8% for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.).
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with 5.3% at Plains All American Pipeline LP.
Both pay dividends: Enterprise Products Partners L.P. yields 5.8% and Plains All American Pipeline LP 7.7%.
Plains All American Pipeline LP scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EPD | PAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $82.4B | $18.7B |
| Share price | $38.15 | $26.51 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.6% | 56.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 69.0% | 149% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 0.47 |
| Employees | – | 3,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.3× | – |
| P/S | 1.4× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | 10.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.8× | 7.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 12.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.83 | $42.09 |
| Margin of safety | −3.6% | 37.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% | 12.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.1% (better) | 13.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 7.5% | 204% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 7.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.6% (better) | 7.8% |
| Operating margin | 13.4% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 10.8% (better) | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 5.9% (better) | 4.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.20 | 2.82 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.2× (better) | 2.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.93 | 1.12 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.8% | 7.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.49% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.3% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.2% | 41.0% |
| Held by insiders | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $581K (better) | −$51.5K |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
Go deeper
- EPD stock overview
- EPD income statement
- EPD valuation and score
- PAA stock overview
- PAA income statement
- PAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.